Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2001
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313 · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Iannelli v. United States · Joseph Skilken & Co. v. City of Toledo · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · Ohio v. Gallagher · Patterson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(aln information shall be signed by the prosecuting attorney or his deputy and sworn to or affirmed by him or any other person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Moreover, a charge of conspiracy in an indictment or an information 'need only be so certain and particular as to enable the accused, the court and the jury to determine the crime for which conviction is sought.' [Citation omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. State“to assure that such prosecutions have been investigated by and approved by the only officer authorized to initiate eriminal prosecutions, namely, the prosecuting attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lashley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.