Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 NW2D 256 - Jonathan v. Kvaal

Jonathan v. Kvaal’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2011

2 district · 5 state decisions

301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Micallef v. Miehle Co. · Donnay v. Boulware · Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. · Nord v. Herreid · Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Past experience with a product, however, does not necessarily alert users to all of the dangers associated with the product.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.