State v. Bucholz’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2018
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · Bozza v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Goldhammer · United States v. Edmonson · State Ex Rel. Gentry v. Becker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I wish to express that procedural justice is subordinate to substantive justice. If the courts of law devise a standard or rule of justice, it must inordinately follow that these standards or rules of procedure result in a just decision or outcome.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A]s against an unwilling defendant, a valid sentence cannot be increased in severity after he has commenced the serving thereof_ (emphasis added).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Puthoff · State v. Munk“It is the settled law in South Dakota that the oral sentence is the only sentence and the written sentence must conform to it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Puthoff · State v. Sieler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.