403 Pa. Super. 455 - Commonwealth v. Lenig’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Commonwealth v. Pierce · Commonwealth v. Hubbard · New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Chevrolet Motor Division, General Motors Corp. · Commonwealth v. Sneed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“PCHA”) or the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). The PCHA was modified in part, repealed in part and reenacted as the PCRA, effective April 13, 1988. The new provision applies to all actions for collateral relief instituted on or after that date. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. 3 . The precise question raised instantly, whether appellant’s double jeopardy rights were violated, was decided in his previous appeal. The issue is therefore covered by res judicata or the “law of the case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.