Gibson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 204 So. 2d 515 - State v. Jones · 375 So. 2d 836 - State v. Pinder · 377 So. 2d 1149 - White v. State · Williams v. State · 394 So. 2d 979 - Bell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ince the two offenses for which the defendants stand convicted ... involve the same criminal act as a necessary element of each offense, the defendants' convictions and sentences for possession of a firearm may not stand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gibson“A defendant may not be convicted of two or more offenses which involve the same criminal acts. In such an instance, only the conviction for the greater charge may stand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gibson“[t]he omission of the intent element from a robbery instruction is not fundamental error in the absence of a real dispute on that question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.