State v. Wagner’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 329 So. 2d 302 - Chicken'N'Things v. Murray · 343 So. 2d 9 - State v. Bales · 118 So. 2d 792 - State v. Smith · 89 So. 2d 641 - Mathews v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company · 392 So. 2d 568 - City of Winter Park v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an error so fundamental in character as to fatally infect the judgment and render it void.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Combs v. State“complete failure to observe essential requirements of law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Combs v. State“departure from the essential requirements of law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Combs v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.