Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 So. 2d 247 - Miller v. State

403 So. 2d 247 - Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1988
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. State · 372 So. 2d 829 - Everage v. Gibson · 42 Ala. App. 529 - Ward v. State · State v. Horton · 62 Tenn. App. 269 - Reynolds v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[s]ection 26-12-7 does not specify the amount of support necessary to toll the statute and it is not essential that the reputed father meet all of the child's material needs. The determinative question is whether, under the facts of the case, the payments constitute an acknowledgment of paternity. If the payments do constitute such an acknowledgment, the reputed father has supported the child within the meaning of § 26-12-7. See, Reynolds v. Richardson , 62 Tenn. App. 269 , 462 S.W.2d 233 (1970)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.