Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 So. 2d 453 - Williams v. State

403 So. 2d 453 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2016

8 state decisions

301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Mathiason · Industrial National Bank of Rhode Island v. Wingate Corp. · State v. Webb · United States v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[t]his was true even though appellant appeared cooperative and voluntarily accompanied the officer. A number of decisions support the right of a peace officer to conduct a pat-down search for weapons, for protection of the officer, prior to placing a person into a police vehicle.” Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Williams] and his vehicle resembled closely, but not exactly, the description given by the victim of the crime. The circumstances were sufficient to warrant further investigation but not to support the arrest of appellant at that time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining `custody,' the majority of courts have utilized an objective test ... whether, under the circumstances, a reasonable person would have believed he was in custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.