State v. Meredith’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
September 1994
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 356 So. 2d 1370 - State v. Martin · 375 So. 2d 924 - State v. Kimble · 400 So. 2d 580 - State v. Meredith · 377 So. 2d 328 - State v. Dupree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Before a co-conspirator’s declaration may be introduced under this exception, a prima facie case of conspiracy must have been established and it must be shown that the declaration was made in furtherance of the common enterprise and during its continuation, (citations omitted) Introduction of a hearsay declaration without fulfillment of these requirements violates both the statute which prohibits the admission of hearsay evidence not falling within any exception to the rule, La.R.S. 15:434, and the constitutional guarantee of an accused’s right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him. (citations omitted).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quinn“should have known what was going on in his own home...,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.