Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 So. 2d 956 - Ray v. State

403 So. 2d 956 - Ray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

259
cited by 259 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

256 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 259 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020 · most notably Sochor v. Florida (1992), 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000)

256 state decisions

82019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · De Jonge v. Oregon · Cole v. State of Arkansas · Brown v. State · 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 259 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where a jurisdictional error appears or where the interests of justice present a compelling demand for its application.”
    36 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is not fundamental error to convict a defendant under an erroneous lesser included charge when he had an opportunity to object to the charge and failed to do so if: 1) the improperly charged offense is lesser in degree and penalty than the main offense or 2) defense counsel requested the improper charge or relied on that charge as evidenced by argument to the jury or other affirmative action. Failure to timely object precludes relief from such a conviction.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “(d) No party may assign as error grounds of appeal the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects, and the grounds of his objection. Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the presence of the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.