Settles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 1986
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The allegation in a motion to revoke probation that probationer has committed a particular offense when the motion is heard by the court does not constitute jeopardy and will not bar a subsequent prosecution for such offense. Especially is this true in the case at bar where the court declined to revoke probation." Settles v. State, 403 S.W.2d 417, 418 (Tex.Cr. App.1966) (emphasis added). See also Banks v. State, 503 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.Cr. App.1974).”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re D. B. · Davenport v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.