Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 SW2D 426 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1982

3 state decisions

10196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 120 Tex. Crim. 219 - Nichols v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 387 - Barrera v. State · Holley v. State · 171 Tex. Crim. 408 - Tracey v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The agreed evidence reflects that the parking lot is located immediately adjacent to State Highway No. 199 and a public highway known as Roberts Cutoff. The lot ‘is open to the public generally and is open to use of the public generally, and automobiles and other motor vehicles operated by the public go on and come from said parking lot at all times of the day and night. The surface of the lot is paved with an asphalt surface and there are areas marked off on said surface indicating spaces for parking of motor vehicles. There is a space for automobiles being driven upon the parking lot to travel. This space for travel could also be described as a pathway. It is also possible for automobiles traveling on said parking lot to pass from one of the adjacent roadways to the other * * * the parking lot is totally open and unobstructed on its west and north sides, those being the sides adjacent to Roberts Cutoff and State Highway 199. * * * “ ‘Automobiles and trucks are driven and operated by members of the public on the parking lot and no one is excluded from driving on such lot.’ “ ‘The owner of the drive-in allows the public to use it (the parking lot) for parking.’ “ ‘The parking lot is sometimes used for traveling from one of the adjacent roadways to the other.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.