Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 SW2D 440 - Salas v. State

Salas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ginsberg v. United States · Commarrilo v. State · Rogers v. State · Kirk v. State · 168 Tex. Crim. 223 - Pitcock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Hearsay evidence has been defined as evidence which does not derive its value solely from the credit to be given to the witness himself, but rests in part on the veracity and competency of some other person. In terms of the actual conduct of a trial, hearsay evidence is that which a given witness offers in court (a) which is not based on his own knowledge, but is merely a repetition of what he has been told or the offering by him of a writing prepared by another, and (b) which is offered as proof of the truth of the matter contained or stated therein.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.