Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 S.W.2d 790 - Jasper v. State

Jasper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 144 Tex. Crim. 270 - Reeves v. State · Hartgraves v. State · Alexander v. State · Hughes v. Rhodes · Moye v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The complaint and information are fatally defective for the additional reason that the charges are made disjunctively, it being alleged that appellant allowed the minor to remain in a place where intoxicating liquors were kept, drunk, used or sold. Lenox v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 194 , 152 S.W.2d 342 .” (Emphasis in original).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.