Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 403 U.S. 573 - United States v. Harris

United States v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

3,801
cited by 3,801 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

1,105 federal appellate · 157 district · 2,000 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,801 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Illinois v. Gates (1983), United States v. Leon (1984)

1,105 federal appellate · 157 district · 2,000 state decisions — followed in 48 states

2.1k0197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Harris (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States

Cited together with Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Illinois v. Gates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,801 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Admissions of crime ... carry their own indicia of credibility-sufficient at least to support a finding of probable cause to search.”
    136 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]echnical requirements of elaborate specificity once exacted under common law pleadings have no proper place in this area”
    41 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The latter is likely to be someone who is himself involved in criminal activity or is, at least, someone who enjoys the confidence of criminals.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.