Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 A2D 590 - State v. Porter

State v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2002

14 state decisions

801979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wright · United States v. House · State v. Warren · State v. Elwell · State v. Rice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “3. A person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of a crime if: A. With the intent of promoting or facilitating the commission of the crime, he solicits such other person to commit the crime, or aids or agrees to aid or attempts to aid such other person in planning or committing the crime. A person is an accomplice under this subsection to any crime the commission of which was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of his conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “C. He is an accomplice of such other person in the commission of the crime, as provided in subsection 3.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.