Jones v. Gasch’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.2d 1231 · 1967
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), United States v. Polizzi (1974)
46 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3432 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Hoffman v. Blaski · Singer v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) location of the defendant; (2) location of possible -witnesses; (3) location of events likely to be in issue; (4) location of documents and records likely to be involved; (5) disruption of the defendant’s business; (6) (1) expense to the parties; (7) (7) location of counsel; (8) relative accessibility of place of trial; (9) docket condition of each district of division involved; and (10) any other special elements which might affect the transfer.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'(t)he ultimate question . . . is whether it is possible to select a fair and impartial jury, and the proper occasion for such a determination is upon the voir dire examination.' It is then, and more usually only then, that a fully adequate appraisal of the claim can be made, and it is then that it may be found that, despite earlier prognostications, removal of the trial is unnecessary.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Transfer In Other Cases. For the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice, the court upon motion of the defendant may transfer the proceeding as to him or any one or more of the counts thereof to another district.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.