Chambers v. Beaunit Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.2d 128 · 1968
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 1999 · most notably Automotive, Petroleum & Allied Industries Employees Union, Local No. 618 v. Town & Country Ford, Inc. (1983), Schultz v. Owens-Illinois Inc. (1982)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston · Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Nevertheless, an arbitrator is confined to interpretation and application of the collective bargaining agreement; he does not sit to dispense his own brand of industrial justice. He may of course look for guidance from many sources, yet his award is legitimate only so long as it draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement. When the arbitrator’s words manifest an infidelity to this obligation, courts have no choice but to refuse enforcement of the award.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The question of whether a grievance is timely filed is a procedural question, which, under the Supreme Court's holding in [Wiley ] is left to the arbitrator for decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.