Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.2d 1400 · 1969
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 1986
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk · Brenner v. Manson · Risse Horlein · Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De Roo · Loukomsky v. Gerlich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duffy v. Tegtmeyer“* * * this court is vested with authority to issue a writ of mandamus in aid of its jurisdiction in appeals from the tribunals of the Patent Office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duffy v. Tegtmeyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.