United States v. Haimowitz’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.2d 38 · 1968
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2001 · most notably United States v. Hooks (1988), United States v. Mackenzie (1985)
23 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6041 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on United States v. Carroll · United States v. Blumberg · 253 F. Supp. 400 - United States v. Honer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any person who— Willfully aids or assists in, or procures, counsels, or advises the preparation or presentation under, or in con-neetion with any matter arising under, the internal revenue laws, of a return, affidavit, claim, or other document, which is fraudulent or is false as to any material matter, shall be guilty of a felony . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S]section 6041 is intended to help the government locate and check upon recipients of income and the amounts they receive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“All persons engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business to another person, of rent, salaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income ..., of $600 or more in any taxable year, ... shall render a true and accurate return to the Secretary, under such regulations and in such form and manner and to such extent as may be prescribed by the Secretary, setting forth the amount of such gains, profits, and income, and the name and address of the recipient of such payment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.