Hanna v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.2d 405 · 1968
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4251 · 47 U.S.C. § 202 · 47 U.S.C. § 220
Relies on Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank · Lansky v. Savoretti · United States v. Sugden · Hanna v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) identify the calling party (the user of the blue box), and others with whom he may be acting in concert.. . identification of the telephone line from which the fraudulent calls are originating must be followed by the more difficult identification of the specific individual making the calls—this is, of course, of paramount importance; (ii) establish the location from which the calls are originating;”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.