Moran v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.2d 663 · 1968
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 1990 · most notably 68 Ill. 2d 158 - People v. Wipfler (1977), United States v. Burkhart (1972)
33 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3052
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Henry v. United States · Clewis v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Evidence of other offenses is admissible if it tends to show guilty motive, intent, knowledge, identity, plan, scheme, or course of conduct on the part of the accused.” Moran v. United States, 10th Cir. 1968, 404 F. 2d 663 , 667.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * The test of admissibility of evidence of other crimes is whether it is material to any issue in the case and tends to prove the crime for which the defendant is on trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Farrar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.