Benjamin F. Marlowe v. J. Frank Coakley’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.2d 70 · 1969
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1983
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Robichaud v. Ronan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] California district attorney's presentation of evidence to a grand jury is clearly within the scope of his duty to advise and present information to the grand jury .... The function is an 'integral part of the judicial process.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gray III v. Bell“A prosecuting attorney is immune from civil suits for acts committed in the performance of duties constituting an integral part of the judicial process,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gray III v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.