Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

404 F.2d 856

Docket No. 26431.

Smith v. Cohen

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-12-12

2 counsel of record

Relies on Celebrezze v. O'Brient · Celebrezze v. Kelly · Clinch v. Celebrezze

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-12-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2006

3 district · 2 state decisions

6019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

C. O. Brown, Alexandria, La., for appellant.

Edward L. Shaheen, U.S. Atty., Leven H. Harris, Shreveport, La., for appellee.

Before WISDOM and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges, and HUGHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant filed application for Social Security benefits under the provisions of 42 U.S.C.A. 416(i). The only issue is whether the decision of the Secretary holding that the plaintiff failed to establish that he is under a disability as defined in the Act is supported by substantial evidence to support the administrative determination. On the administrative record the district court answered this question affirmatively and granted summary judgment for the Secretary. The record discloses this requisite substantial evidence. It follows that the judgment for the Secretary was properly entered and is accordingly affirmed. Celebrezze v. Kelly, 331 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1964); Clinch v. Celebrezze, 328 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1964), Celebrezze v. O'Brient, 323 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1963); Bowen v. Gardner, 356 F.2d 484 (5th Cir. 1966).

/404/f2d/856 · .json · Public domain