United States v. Bush’s Empirical Analysis
404 F.3d 263 · 2005
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1342 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 510 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on United States v. Booker · Faretta v. California · Franks v. Delaware · New York v. Belton · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'At bottom, the Faretta right to self-representation is not absolute, and the 'government's interest in ensuring the integrity and efficiency of the trial at times outweighs the defendant's interest in acting as his own lawyer.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an effort to manipulate and distort the trial process”); United States v. Kaczynski, 239 F.3d 1108 , 1118 (9th Cir.2001) (request”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense shall commence within seventy days from the filing date (and making public) of the information or indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer in the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.