Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 F.3d 371 - Geiger v. Jowers

Geiger v. Jowers’s Empirical Analysis

404 F.3d 371 · 2005

Citation profile

342
cited by 342 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 342 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Mayfield v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (2008), Elsensohn v. St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office (2008)

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

2080200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Sandin v. Conner · Denton v. Hernandez · Yohey v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 342 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Geiger does not have a federally protected liberty interest in having these grievances resolved to his satisfaction. As he relies on a legally nonexistent interest, any alleged due process violation arising from the alleged failure to investigate his grievances is indisputably meritless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although pro se briefs are to be liberally construed, pro se litigants have no general immunity from the rule that issues and arguments not briefed on appeal are abandoned,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.