Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 F.3d 395 - Rittenhouse v. Eisen

Rittenhouse v. Eisen’s Empirical Analysis

404 F.3d 395 · 2005

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Perle Albert Sorah, Jr. · Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates · Hessinger & Associates v. U.S. Trustee · Fickling v.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The issue of whether pre-petition attorney fees are dischargeable in bankruptcy is res nova in this circuit. We join three other circuits in concluding that pre-petition attorney fees are discharge-able, and we affirm the order of the district court. “11 U.S.C. § 727(b) provides that a discharge under Chapter 7 relieves a debtor of all debts incurred prior to the filing of a petition for bankruptcy, except those nineteen categories of debts specifically enumerated in 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a). A debt for pre-petition legal services is not one of the non-discharge-able debts enumerated in § 523(a).””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.