Vazquez v. Ferre’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 29 U.S.C. § 49 (Wagner-Peyser Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Monroe v. Pape · Cort v. Ash
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“first appeared in that part of the 1875 revision of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 which addressed jurisdiction of the circuit courts. Rev.Stat. § 629(16). 4 The Fourth Circuit contends, and the district court in Vazquez agreed, that the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzalez v. Young“based upon the deprivation of statutory as well as constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzalez v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.