Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 F. Supp. 2d 104 - Hatfill v. Ashcroft

404 F. Supp. 2d 104 - Hatfill v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

9 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Paul v. Davis · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Alexander v. Sandoval

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.