Mueller v. England’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 628 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force · Hewitt v. Grabicki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ach agency that maintains a system of records shall . . . maintain all records which are used by the agency in making any determination about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in the determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mueller v. Winter“new information convinced [him] that the contested original fitness report was inaccurate and needed to be corrected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mueller v. Winter“unable to find specific information to justify the reporting senior's revision of [Mueller's] evaluation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mueller v. Winter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.