Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 Md. 631 - In Re Honorable Lamdin

In Re Honorable Lamdin’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2024

10 state decisions

40200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge Diener · In Re Kneifl · Attorney Grievance Commission v. Harris · In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge Turney · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ferreri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “misconduct in office, the persistent failure by a judge to perform the duties of the judge's office, or conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “undignified, discourteous, and disparaging[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.