Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 Mich. 59 - People v. Kretchmer

People v. Kretchmer’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2024

3 state decisions

20197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect persons (the officers) from physical violence and harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.