Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 P2D 73 - LaRue v. State

LaRue v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
November 1977
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · Gillespie v. State · Stokes v. State · Lavender v. McLeod · Baxter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question of excessiveness of punishment must be determined by a study of all the facts and circumstances in each particular case, and the Court of Criminal Appeals does not have the power to modify a sentence unless we can conscientiously say that under all facts and circumstances the sentence is so excessive as to shock the conscience of the court.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We have repeatedly held that the Court of Criminal Appeals will not interfere with the discretion of the trial court in granting or refusing an application for suspended sentence in absence of an abuse of discretion. Lavender v. McLeod, Okl.Cr., 325 P.2d 1080 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.