Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 P2D 738 - DeBaca v. State

DeBaca v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on School District No. 9 v. District Boundary Board Ex Rel. Fremont County · Stolldorf v. Stolldorf · Harris v. State · Mosko v. Smith · Benham Construction Co. v. Rentz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * it is well settled that the control in connection with leading questions in a case is largely within the sound discretion of the court. * * * The trial court’s action is not to be disturbed unless there has been an abuse of discretion * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.