Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 P3D 1187 - Ransom v. Ransom

Ransom v. Ransom’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reavis v. Reavis · Gurney v. Gurney · Feaster v. Feaster · Hermreck v. United Parcel Service, Inc. · Grynberg v. L & R EXPLORATION VENTURE

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court has consistently recognized the broad discretion enjoyed by a district court in child custody matters. We will not interfere with the district court's custody determination absent procedural error or a clear abuse of discretion. In determining whether an abuse of discretion has occurred, our primary consideration is the reasonableness of the district court's decision in light of the evidence presented. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the district court's determination, affording every favorable inference to the prevailing party and omitting from our consideration the conflicting evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “ability and willingness of each parent to allow the other to provide care without intrusion, respect the other parent's rights and responsibilities, including the right to privacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.