404 So. 2d 1192 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
108 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 769 So. 2d 1158 - State v. Guzman (2000), 915 So. 2d 291 - State v. Juniors (2005)
108 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Pointer v. Texas · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · McCarthy v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]henever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, it is incumbent upon the trial judge to inform the defendant that by pleading guilty he waives (a) his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination; (b) his right to trial and jury trial where it is applicable; (c) his right to confront his accusers, and to make sure that the accused has a full understanding of what the plea connotes and of its consequence.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pertuit · State v. Newman“Our decision will be fully applicable to this case and any other case filed and presently pending in this court involving the issue presented herein. In all other cases, however, we will apply our holding to guilty pleas entered after this decision becomes final.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in taking a plea of guilty, an express and knowing waiver of at least these three federal constitutional rights [the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination; the right to trial and jury trial where applicable; the right to confront one's accuser] must be made, which waiver cannot be presumed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.