Cassibry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably 599 So. 2d 529 - Smith v. Dorsey (1992), Mitchell v. State (1989)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 154 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 207 · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 7 U.S.C. § 1986 · 7 U.S.C. § 610
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Moore v. Illinois · Jordan v. De George
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test is whether the language conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“... a very wide discretion must be afforded trial judges in deciding when to permit a defendant to examine the statement of a prosecution witness... . Two tests are important in determining whether the accused should have been given a copy of the statement: (1) did the statement contain information favorable to the accused not revealed in the trial? and (2) was the statement substantially the same as the testimony of the witness? 404 So.2d at 1371 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“authorized by any law passed or order made by any board of which he may ... have been a member... .?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.