Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 SO2D 403 - Onnestad v. State

Onnestad v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2011

15 state decisions

1101981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Davis · McCord v. State · State v. Braverman · Love v. Love · Alleluio v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Good cause has been found to exist where the defendant demonstrates `that his previously tendered guilty plea was infected by misapprehension, undue persuasion, ignorance, or was entered by one not competent to know its consequence or that it was otherwise involuntary, or that the ends of justice would be served by withdrawal of such plea.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.