Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 SO2D 627 - Lee v. Bronner

Lee v. Bronner’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2014

6 state decisions

301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 269 So. 2d 659 - Department of Administration v. Horne · 344 So. 2d 761 - Zeigler v. Baker · Powers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · 331 So. 2d 665 - Jeannie's Grocery v. Baldwin County Elec. Mem. Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'If a taxpayer does not launch an assault, it is not likely that there will be an attack from any other source, because the agency involved is usually in accord with the expenditure. There may be instances in which the affected public official might pursue the matter. The Attorney General would be an appropriate officer to bring such a suit, but in some instances this is not done and it is in such cases that it is only the taxpayer's attack which preserves the public treasure.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.