Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 SO2D 760 - State v. Escobedo

State v. Escobedo’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2006

5 state decisions

30198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hepburn v. Chapman · King v. State · 76 So. 2d 645 - Green v. State · Rapp v. State · 111 So. 2d 459 - Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whoever falsely makes, alters, forges or counterfeits a public record, or a certificate, return or attestation of any clerk or register of a court, public register, notary public, town clerk or any public officer, in relation to a matter where such certificate, return or attestation may be received as legal proof; or a charter, deed, will, testament, bond, or writing obligatory, letter of attorney, policy of insurance, bill of lading, bill of exchange or promissory note, or an order, acquittance, or discharge for money or other property, or an acceptance of a bill of exchange or promissory note for the payment of money, or any receipt for money, goods, or other property, or any passage ticket, pass or other evidence of transportation issued by a common carrier, with intent to injure or defraud any person, shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Our forgery statute ... makes whoever `forges' documents of specified classes `with intent to injure or defraud any person' liable to a maximum of [five] years' imprisonment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.