404 So. 2d 813 - Leppla v. Leppla

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2013

1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

PER CURIAM.

¶1In the final judgment of dissolution of marriage on appeal, the trial court failed to set forth the determination of which party would make the mortgage payments and bear the expenses for repair and maintenance on the marital home. We remand for the trial judge to make such determination. If the trial judge should determine that the wife is to make all such payments, exclusive of the husband, provisions shall be made for increasing her equity in the property. Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

¶2We have considered the other points raised in this appeal and find them to be without merit.

¶3Accordingly, this cause is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., and AGNER, ROYCE, Associate Judge, concur.