Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 SO2D 821 - Smith v. Fortune Ins. Co.

Smith v. Fortune Ins. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1987
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Degelos v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. · 327 So. 2d 193 - Hunt v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company · Mary Helen Delong Chumbler, Widow of Raymond Clyde Chumbler, Jr., Etc. v. Alabama Power Company · 105 So. 2d 28 - Rubin v. Kapell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “need not be named in the pleadings in opposition to the party calling him, to be called an adverse party witness. (citation omitted)... . the test is whether the party sought to be called "occupied an adverse position toward" the party seeking to call him (citation omitted) and could have been named as a party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.