404 So. 2d 916 - State v. Morstein’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1993
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Roviaro v. United States · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary · McCray v. State of Illinois · Rugendorf v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a genuine issue on the affiant's veracity supported by convincing allegations of fact which, if proven, would establish the falsity of the affidavit”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Evins · State v. Feeback“"Constitutional provisions insure a person from unreasonable search and seizure of his house, papers and effects. No such search or seizure shall be made except upon warrant issued upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. U.S. Const. amend. IV; La. Const. art. 1, § 5. Conformably, our Code of Criminal Procedure in art. 162 provides in pertinent part: A search warrant may issue only upon probable cause established to the satisfaction of the judge, by the affidavit of a credible person, reciting facts establishing the cause for issuance of the warrant. We have held that probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the affiant's knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient unto themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has been committed. State v. Mena, 399 So.2d 149 (La.1981); State v. Wichers, 392 So.2d 419 (La.1980); State v. Baker, 389 So.2d 1289 (La.1980); State v. Richards, 357 So.2d 1128 (La.1978). The judicial officer must be supplied with enough information to support an independent judgment that probable cause exists for the issuance of a warrant. Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560 , 91 S.Ct. 1031 , 28 L.Ed.2d 306 (1971); State v. Mena, supra ; State v. Wichers, supra ; State v. Baker, supra ; State v. Richards, supra . * * * * * * "It is well established that the credibility of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Evins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.