Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 U.S. 519 - Haines v. Kerner

Haines v. Kerner’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

18,809
cited by 18,809 later decisions
72
cited 72 times by the Supreme Court
35
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

4,071 federal appellate · 2,608 district · 429 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18,809 later decisions (72 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2025 · most notably Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007), Estelle v. Gamble (1976)

4,071 federal appellate · 2,608 district · 429 state decisions — followed in 35 states

6.1k0197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedHaines v. Kerner (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Dioguardi v. Durning · Schilb v. Kuebel · Haines v. Kerner

Cited together with Conley v. Gibson · Estelle v. Gamble · Wolff v. McDonnell · Cruz v. Beto · Hughes v. Rowe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18,809 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.”
    241 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “denial of due process in the steps leading to (disciplinary) confinement.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “and made no adjustments to reflect plaintiffs' pro se status in its handling of defendants' motions for summary judgment. 27 As this court recently noted when reversing a grant of summary judgment against a pro se plaintiff, 28 (s)ince his application for appointment of counsel was denied, plaintiff is 'entitled to an opportunity to offer proof' unless 'it appears”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.