Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 404 U.S. 71 - Reed v. Reed

Reed v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

3,649
cited by 3,649 later decisions
186
cited 186 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

629 federal appellate · 355 district · 1,511 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,649 later decisions (186 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center (1985), Stanley v. Illinois (1972)

629 federal appellate · 355 district · 1,511 state decisions — followed in 50 states

2.0k0197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257

Relies on Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co. · Royster Guano Co v. Commonwealth of Virginia · McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of Chicago · Cruz v. Hauck

Cited together with Frontiero v. Richardson · Royster Guano Co v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Craig v. Boren · Dandridge v. Williams · Shapiro v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,649 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must rest upon some ground of difference having a fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation, so that all persons similarly circumstanced shall be treated alike.”
    210 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[P]roviding dissimilar treatment for men and women who are ... similarly situated... violates the Equal Protection Clause.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Statutory classifications that distinguish between males and females are 'subject to scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.