Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 F.2d 803 - Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. American Oil Co.

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. American Oil Co.’s Empirical Analysis

405 F.2d 803 · 1969

Citation profile

105
cited by 105 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Squirtco v. Seven-Up Co. (1980), Olle v. Henry & Wright Corp. (1990)

59 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

410196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · United States v. Swift & Co. · Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co. · White Motor Company v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To repeat: caution, substantial change, unforeseenness, oppressive hardship, and a clear showing are the requirements.””
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so important that dangers [which prompted the injunction], once substantial, [had] become attenuated to a shadow.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(n)othing less than a clear showing of grievous wrong evoked by new and unforeseen conditions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.