Moore v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
405 F.3d 1208 · 2005
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 325 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Winschel v. Commissioner of Social Security (2011), Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (2009)
16 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bloodsworth v. Heckler · Crawford v. Commissioner of Social Security · Jones v. Apfel · MaCgregor v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 325 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We thus join our sister circuits in holding that where a claimant has presented a colorable claim of mental impairment, the social security regulations require the ALJ to complete a PRTF and append it to the decision, or incorporate its mode of analysis into his findings and conclusions. Failure to do so requires remand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.