Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 405 F.3d 278 - Murray v. Earle

Murray v. Earle’s Empirical Analysis

405 F.3d 278 · 2005

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
4
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Deville v. Marcantel (2009), Dillon v. Rogers (2010)

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

790200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Anderson v. Creighton · Bruton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Confession evidence (regardless of how it was obtained) is so biasing that juries will convict on the basis of confession alone.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If counsel was not present for some permissible reason when an admission was obtained, the greatest care must be taken to assure that the admission was voluntary, in the sense not only that it was not coerced or suggested, but also that it was not the product of ignorance of rights or of adolescent fantasy, fright or despair.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “determine whether the plaintiff has suffered a violation of his constitutional rights and, if so, whether a reasonable official should have known that he was violating the plaintiff's constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.