Walgreen Co. v. Rullan’s Empirical Analysis
405 F.3d 50 · 2005
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Family Winemakers v. Jenkins (2010), Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode Island (2007)
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Exxon Corporation v. Governor of Maryland Shell Oil Company · H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du Mond
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ojver fifty percent of out-of-Commonwealth entities have been forced to undergo the entire administrative process compared to less than twenty-five percent of local applicants. Of those applicants forced to endure the hearing process, the Secretary has granted certificates to ninety percent of the local applicants but only to fifty-eight percent of out-of-Commonwealth applicants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under the dormant Commerce Clause, if a state law has either the purpose or effect of significantly favoring in-state commercial interests over out-of-state interests, the law will routinely be invalidated unless the discrimination is demonstrably justified by a valid factor unrelated to economic protectionism”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.