Flying Inc Cfj Tfj Ncr v. Comdata Network Inc’s Empirical Analysis
405 F.3d 821 · 2005
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Mackenzie v. Denver City and County of (2005), Indmar Products Co. v. Commissioner (2006)
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Salve Regina College v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All TCH Card Transactions processed through the Trendar System, including without limitation TCH Cards bearing a MasterCard or Visa brand, shall be cleared directly through TCH as opposed to any third party network, such as and without limitation the MasterCard network or Visa network, to the fullest extent permitted by the policies, rules, or regulations, as amended from time to time (including their interpretations thereof) by third party network providers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Though not made by the district judge himself, the findings `are formally his, they are not to be rejected out-of-hand, and they will stand if supported by evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whether the [lower] court failed to consider or accord proper weight or significance to relevant evidence are questions of law we review de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.